Lisa Sparxxx is Booble's Girl of the Year:

08/01/2007

Beating out the heavily favored Jesse Jane, who actually was never even in the running, it ended up being between Lisa and Brandy Talore, who had Howard Stern's support (kinda shows how irrelevant he has become huh...)

Congrats to Lisa

Can Some Explain To Me (Stormy Daniels on ABC Nightline):

07/31/2007

Why it is that when some moronic airhead goes on Howard Stern to judge a vomiting contest or some other such crap all of porndom writes about it.

Yet when a well spoken contract performer and producer director goes on Nightline and goes toe to toe with Martin Bashir AND serves our industry well...nobody gives a rats ass

To see it go here

http://youtube.com/watch?v=TYxHpzR2kQk

Damn well done Stormy, we need more girls like you in the biz and a lot less idiots.

Check Your Dead Pool:

If you had Ingmar Bergman, Tom Snyder and Bill Walsh you have a winner.

Kimberly Writes:

So far this was my only hate mail, I expected more

I can't believe that you believe animals" DO NOT THINK or have the ability to Rationalize and use Logic." That is the most narrow minded statement I've ever heard from you. Maybe your [I think she means You're] not as intelligent and aware as I thought! And just because something is OWNED doesn't mean it should be abused, no matter what kind of animal it is!!!!! It's bad enough that people beat and mame [maim] each other, we're suppose [supposed] to be the "intelligent" ones. These animals are taught and bread [bred] for fighting they do not Choose it! Not only is it cruel, this sport has produced a very dangerous bread [breed] of animal. They and their owners pose a threat to innocent children and adults. They are bead [bred] to attack and not let go until their pray [prey] is dead. So, who do you pro posse [propose] protect us from those "dumbass jock" that bread [breed] these Killing Machines? As much as I hate the government sticking their nose where it doesn't belong, we do need laws to protect us from people that don't feel or think of anyone but themselves! What about a married couple, is a spouse entitled to abuse the other just because the other chooses to stay? We need laws to protect those (human & animal) who can't protect themselves! I wish they did more listening to the people's needs and less to their own (wallets)!

And as far as animal intelligence you obviously don't do enough reading! I suggest you do some research on the subject! I personally think animals are more intelligent then [than] some humans! Think about it, why do you think the Dolphins hang around the boat? To just say "Hi"or they know your bait attracts fish!!!!!!!

K

OK I ain't gonna beat up on Kimberly about her spelling but ya gotta admit it IS funny. But the thing that really gets me is the lack of reading comprehension. I didn't write a word of that FRANK DID! and now that I have sufficiently tossed Frank under the bus....It should be pretty obvious that his screed was very tongue in cheek.

Now you will note Kimberly did not say that she was against rat fighting, or for that matter pig fighting, the benefits of which would feed the poor...assuming the poor, of course aren't jewish but then when is the last time you saw a poor Jewish person? Cept maybe Luke Ford....but he dont eat any kind of meat so it doesnt matter.

Frank Responds To Kimberly:

Mike,

I can’t Thank You enough for posting K’s well thought out response to my observations and satirical proposal. It has truly made getting out of bed before noon worth with effort.

If you’d be so kind, I would like to make a comment or two.

K writes:
I can't believe that you believe animals" DO NOT THINK or have the ability to Rationalize and use Logic."

Frank responds:
As Mike pointed out, Frank was signed at the bottom of the article as well as a disclaimer (Frank writes) inserted into the title. K missed this point entirely, demonstrating her lack of attention from the start. ( I assume K is a her, based solely on the wild illogic and complete lack of reason. IF I am mistaken on this account I apologize. However, I do find myself wondering if your name ends with an “ i “.)

Make NO Mistake. I DO NOT BELIEVE, any animal other than humans have the ability to Think, Rationalize or use Logic. That does not mean however they are incapable of instinctively knowing to eat a banana –vs- a stone. When a parrot speaks, does it know what it is saying or is it simply mimicking what it has heard? Animals survive solely on instinctive behavior. They are able to perform various tasks given them, these tasks being taught on a Pleasure-Pain (reward basis, if that term makes you “feel” better) level. IF, the said animal could in fact “think, reason or use logic” they would not stop at pushing the swimmer around in a pool to get a single fish. THEY would “understand” the basis of the reward and devise other similar tricks in order to procure more of their desired object. This is not done. They simply do what they have “learned” without any reasoning into how they received their reward or how to obtain more. When given the signal again, they repeat the task.

K writes:
And just because something is OWNED doesn't mean it should be abused, no matter what kind of animal it is!!!!!

Frank responds:
No mention was made as to My Approval or Disapproval of animal abuse. I simply pointed out the inconsistency in the argument being made. Although, I did suggest using a different species and provided what I deem as benefits from doing so.

K writes:
These animals are taught and bread [bred] for fighting they do not Choose it!

Frank responds:
As for them “not choosing to fight”. If, as you propose, animals have the ability to reason and use logic, they MUST be choosing to fight. Otherwise, they would see the destructiveness in it and refuse. Unless, however, they enjoy the competitive nature in the sport and rewards associated with winning. Much like the “Ultimate Fighters” of our own species.

K writes:
So, who do you pro posse [propose] protect us from those "dumbass jock" that bread [breed] these Killing Machines?

Frank responds:
Self preservation is, or should be, your primary defense. Neither the Federal nor State Governments are purposed with protecting the citizens from mean dogs. Your local police are not able to protect you from every mishap that may come your way. If you believe by passing more laws they will, you are going to be sorely disappointed. I suggest you lock yourself in a secure closet wearing a helmet and pads and arrange for provisions to be brought to you.

K writes:
As much as I hate the government sticking their nose where it doesn't belong, we do need laws to protect us from people that don't feel or think of anyone but themselves!

Frank responds:
Based on your previous statements, it would seem you DO believe the government should “stick its nose” into every aspect of our personal lives. How else is it going to Protect Us?

K writes:
What about a married couple, is a spouse entitled to abuse the other just because the other chooses to stay? We need laws to protect those (human & animal) who can't protect themselves!

Frank responds:
Self preservation is again required here. One must make choices and take responsibility for oneself. That in NO WAY gives one individual the right to abuse (physically or mentally) another. However, it does not excuse one from their personal responsibly to depart from an abusive situation. Yes, there are times when a third party is needed to assist in that departure. Many times however, the abused return to abusive situations because of their lack of good choices. Neither the Government, the Church nor Good Intentioned Friends can force someone else to make good choices.

K writes:
I personally think animals are more intelligent then [than] some humans!

Frank responds:
Here in lies part of K’s frustration. Although I may agree I enjoy the company of some animals over the company or some individuals, I certainly could not agree that an animal is more intelligent than a human. K espouses great love and caring for animals yet displays a low regard for humanity. Thus elevating the lower life form above the higher. This is an act of self deprecation and if carried to its fruition, is ultimately destructive.

As much as K would like to believe otherwise, Lassie will not be capable of licking the wounds of this destructive belief.

Frank

Michael Vick...Just Another.....Thug:

07/30/2007

I haven't written about the whole Michael Vick thing in part because Im not a football fan, I always figured if you showed me a guy glued to a TV set on a beautiful fall afternoon I could show you a guy that wasn't getting any.

The other reason is because he is a disgusting human being.and was even before the dogfighting charges. I can't help think that if Arthur Blank had called him on the carpet for the numerous other incidents he has been involved in maybe this wouldnt have happened even though I know in my head it still would have. Once a thug getting drafted into the NFL isn't going to suddenly make you into a respectable human being.

OK I'm Probably Going To Catch Mountains Of Hell Over This One...But It IS Well Thought Out

Ban Rat Fights Too? (Frank Writes):

I called my proxy friend today. I refer to Neal Boortz as my “proxy friend” due to the fact that I’ve never really met him or talk to him for that matter. Well, except for the time I went to have him sign his book “The Fair Tax” for me. No chat though, just sign and move along. I suppose the other reason is, most mornings I’m listening to him rant about this or that. Today he was ranting about Michal Vick and dog fighting.

Boortz made the comment that he was having a difficult time reconciling his libertarian views with organized dog fighting. However, he admitted to leaning more to side of this sport being outlawed than to the more rational side of simply disapproving. This put me to thinking so I called to disagree. And to the front of the line I go. [When a caller calls in to disagree with Boortz that caller moves to the top of the line]

Now bare in mind, I only had seconds to introduce reason and this being my radio debut I probably didn’t do too well. But in a nutshell, here was my retort.

Boortz is wrong to agree with outlawing organized dog fights. As I mentioned to him, if M. Vick and friends were betting on rats fighting, you wouldn’t see or hear any big lamenting going on over it. So what’s the difference? And here’s where Boortz caves to “feelings” and/or public opinion. Personally I think it’s his love for his own beast that interferes with his rational thoughts. He actually stated on the radio that he would be in favor of a law to prohibit organized rat fights. Opposing it, on the basis of animal cruelty. Of course. I suppose it’d be bad for the psyche of “the children” too, if they were to hear of such a brutal practice. Well, he thanked me for calling and moved on. I suspect he knew I was correct and simply didn’t wish to admit it.

Now bare with me here and just consider this;

If you believe in private property and all the rights therein, and you recognize that animals of a lower intelligence level than humans can and are the property of humans, then you must agree that outlawing organized dog fights is WRONG. You may dislike the act and you may do whatever is within your ability to discourage others from participating. It is not however your right to forbid them from using their property as they wish. So long as it does not infringe on your individual rights. Incidentally, not being “offended” and all other such terms, ARE NOT RIGHTS.
We humans use animals of every sort in every way imaginable and we’ve been doing it ever since God gave us dominion over them.
o From sending them into space
o To locking them in cages so we can gawk at them
o We hunt them for sport, both leaving the carcass where is falls as well as dragging it home to hang on our walls.
o We create reservations for them. Both to protect the species from extinction as well as to provide luxuriant hunting grounds for those who dare not venture too far into the wild.
o We expend enormous amounts of personal wealth on them, wishing (and some believing) they will love us for doing so. Thus erroneously embodying them with human attributes.
o We breed them to achieve what we consider a more desirable species, shuning the original as inferior.
o Some of our more depraved brethren even have sex with them. It’s only a crime if you can show the horse didn’t enjoy it. I’ll let you look up the court case on this one, but I assure you it exists.

So why are so many people condemning Michal Vick for doing what has been done since the beginning of time and only recently outlawed? I submit to you, the primary reasons are; the erosion of private property rights and politicians pandering to the dumb-masses who “feel” rather than think.

Ponder with me for a moment;

If this is truly about animal cruelty, shouldn’t there be just as large an outcry for the other “abuses” perpetrated on other animals? Is it “fair” to lure animals into a trap designed to smash, starve, dehydrate or hold them in place for their throat to be cut or electrocuted? Since we’ve embodied them with human attributes (some even proposing giving them “rights”) isn’t it wrong for us to impose our desires on their propagation needs? (By the way, one can not give someone or some thing a “right”. One can only deprive others of their rights.)
As I submitted, if Michal Vick and friends had in fact been organizing rat fights, the only issue at hand would be the government not getting its take.

As “unfair” as this may be. The simple truth is, this issue really has nothing to do with animal cruelty. People just like dogs better then rats, and I don’t disagree with that. I’d much prefer waking to a pooch licking my face than a rat chewing my ear.
However, I recognize dogs, cats, apes, gerbils, parrots, etc… ARE LOWER LIFEFORMS than Humans. They DO NOT THINK or have the ability to Rationalize and use Logic. ( O.K. I realize most humans are questionable here too, however they do in fact have the capacity. They have simply chosen not to use it in many cases.) Some have been domesticated for our various pleasures. ALL are dominated by mankind and are owned by man.
We as a capitalistic nation have agreed to accept the existence of person property rights. This DOES NOT mean the government has given us the right to own property. Rather just the opposite. Personal Property Rights Exist. We as a nation simply recognized that fact and forbade the government from depriving us of them.
Over time the weak minded and those who wish to control their fellows for their own benefit have slowly abdicated and usurped the rights of others. I suggest only that we should rationally consider our positions on ALL matters, particularly the small ones, as they are the foundation to the larger ones, before renunciation of further rights. Once abandoned only the most drastic measures can re-establish what belongs.

Bottom line? . Michal Vick is just another dumbass jock who played the part of jester, ultimately upsetting the kingdom with his disreguard toward the courts mascot. If he had trained and fought rats, his only crime would be the avoidance of Uncle Sams cut.

My advice to the future jock with more money and time than he knows what to do with and who has a bit of a Bad Boy streak but needs some good PR. Organize, train and fight Pigs, Boars, Hogs. Lets face it, people don’t really like them all that much. You hardly ever hear about a pet pig, except for Arnold Ziffle on Peticoat Junction and that was long ago. This will satisfy the underground gambling need you have by still not kicking up to Uncle Sam, the sadistic in you too. Pigs squealing for help sounds almost human. Best of all, after the fight when you slaughter the loser you can BBQ him and “Feed Da Poor”. Not only getting rid of evidence but helping your fellow man too. Just don’t charge him for the pork chops, that would counteract the whole good deed thing. So, what’s not like?

Just trying to bring a little reason to a problem before some damn politician jumps on the bandwagon and introduces a Bill to Outlaw Rat Fighting too. Just remember, “The Sleep of Reason, Brings Forth Monsters.”

Frank